Tag: Medicaid

  • Brooklyn Adult Day Care Operators Accused in $38M Medicaid Kickback and False-Billing Scheme

    Brooklyn Adult Day Care Operators Accused in $38M Medicaid Kickback and False-Billing Scheme

    Federal prosecutors have charged eight defendants in an alleged $38 million Medicaid fraud scheme involving two Brooklyn social adult day care centers: APNA Adult Daycare and Ashiana Social Adult Daycare, according to the New York Post⁠.

    The reported indictment alleges that Medicaid recipients were paid cash kickbacks to enroll, recruiters were paid to bring in beneficiaries, and the centers then billed New York Medicaid for services that were not actually provided. Prosecutors also reportedly allege fake sign-in sheets, Pakistan-based billing support, and shell-company transfers labeled as “gifts,” “dividends,” “medicine,” or “laddu.”

    For Find Corporate Waste, the relevance is the public-funds mechanism: Medicaid claims allegedly tied to false attendance, kickback-driven enrollment, and non-rendered services.

    That is the same fraud structure FCW tracks across taxpayer-funded health care programs, including provider eligibility, billing integrity, ownership/control relationships, and public-payment exposure.

    The case also fits a broader enforcement pattern. DOJ previously announced guilty pleas in a $68 million Brooklyn adult day care fraud scheme⁠ and charged two Queens men in an alleged $120 million adult day care and pharmacy fraud scheme⁠. 

  • Circle Medical to Pay $3.325M Over Alleged False Healthcare Claims

    Circle Medical to Pay $3.325M Over Alleged False Healthcare Claims

    San Francisco-based Circle Medical Care of California, Circle Medical Technologies, Inc., and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Nicole Tsang, D.O., agreed to pay $3,325,000 to resolve allegations that they submitted false claims to federal healthcare programs and California commercial insurers.

    According to the DOJ⁠, Circle operates an online telehealth platform offering mental health and primary care services through contract providers, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants. The government alleged that from January 1, 2018 through May 31, 2025, Circle submitted claims using the names and NPI numbers of rendering providers who did not actually provide or supervise the services billed. The claims allegedly involved programs including Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE.  

    The settlement allocates $475,000 to the United States and $2.85 million to California. The matter began as a qui tam whistleblower case filed by Jason Vellen, who will receive $80,750 from the federal recovery and $997,500 from California.  

    This case fits the broader Find Corporate Waste focus on healthcare payment integrity: claims data, provider identifiers, supervision rules, and federal program billing requirements can expose recoverable taxpayer losses. 

  • Ahold Delhaize USA to Pay $40M Over Allegedly Inflated Pharmacy Prices

    Ahold Delhaize USA to Pay $40M Over Allegedly Inflated Pharmacy Prices

    Ahold Delhaize USA Inc.⁠, the parent company behind supermarket pharmacy brands including Giant, Hannaford, Stop & Shop, Food Lion, and others, has agreed to pay $40 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations involving prescription drug pricing.

    According to the DOJ⁠, Ahold Delhaize allegedly reported inflated “usual and customary” prices on claims submitted to Medicare Part D, Medicaid, and TRICARE. Prosecutors said the company operated prescription savings programs that offered discounted prices to enrolled customers, but allegedly failed to report those discounted prices as the pharmacies’ usual and customary prices.

    That distinction matters because usual and customary prices can operate as ceiling prices in federal health care reimbursement formulas. The government alleged that by reporting higher prices, Ahold Delhaize caused federal health care programs to pay more than they should have paid on pharmacy claims.

    Of the $40 million settlement, $32.9 million represents the federal share, with the remainder going to participating states.

    The case began as a whistleblower action filed by Lawrence LaBenne, a Pennsylvania pharmacist at an Ahold Delhaize supermarket.

    He will receive $6,083,587 from the federal recovery.

    The settlement is another example of how pricing representations, claim-level billing data, and insider knowledge drive many False Claims Act recoveries.

    For Find Corporate Waste⁠, the case fits the broader enforcement pattern: federal programs rely on accurate certifications and truthful claim data, and public money can be recovered when those representations are allegedly false.

  • Brooklyn Clinic Owner Convicted in $52M Health Care Fraud and Kickback Scheme

    Brooklyn Clinic Owner Convicted in $52M Health Care Fraud and Kickback Scheme

    A federal jury in the Eastern District of New York convicted Tony Brown-Arkah, 78, owner of American Medical Centers, a Brooklyn clinic that purported to provide substance abuse treatment, for his role in a $52 million health care fraud, narcotics, and kickback scheme.

    According to the Department of Justice, Brown-Arkah’s clinic illegally prescribed Suboxone, a Schedule III narcotic used to treat opioid use disorder, while allowing drug diversion activity to operate around the clinic. Witnesses testified that patients were directed to sell prescriptions outside the facility, including to a van near the clinic.

    The DOJ said many patients received prescriptions signed by a nurse practitioner in Florida who did not see or speak with them. Patients were also subjected to medically unnecessary testing, while Medicare and Medicaid were billed for services that were not provided or not legitimate.

    Brown-Arkah was also convicted of paying patient kickbacks and receiving laboratory kickbacks tied to unnecessary testing referrals. Prosecutors said he used a shell company and sham contract to conceal the payments.

    The case reflects the DOJ’s continued focus on health care fraud involving addiction treatment, laboratory testing, controlled substances, and federal program billing.

    DOJ Press Release — Clinic Owner Convicted for $52M Health Care Fraud, Illegal Narcotics Distribution, and Kickback Scheme

    DOJ Health Care Fraud Unit

    Find Corporate Waste — False Claims Act

  • Takeda to Pay $13.6M Over False Claims Act Allegations Tied to Physician Payments

    Takeda to Pay $13.6M Over False Claims Act Allegations Tied to Physician Payments

    Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc. has agreed to pay $13,670,921 to resolve False Claims Act allegations involving improper payments to physicians who prescribed Trintellix, an antidepressant medication marketed for major depressive disorder. The Department of Justice said the alleged conduct caused false claims to be submitted to Medicare and other federal health care programs.  

    The settlement centers on the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits offering or paying anything of value to induce referrals or prescriptions covered by Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, and other federal health care programs.

    DOJ alleged that from January 2014 through October 2020, Takeda paid improper remuneration to health care providers, including speaker honoraria and meals at high-end restaurants, to encourage prescriptions of Trintellix.  

    According to the government, Takeda selected certain providers for its Trintellix speaker bureau and gave them paid speaking opportunities with the intent that those payments and related benefits would influence prescribing decisions.

    The DOJ also alleged that some prescribers attended multiple programs on the same topic, received meals and drinks, and gained no real educational value from repeated attendance.  

    The case is important because it shows how False Claims Act liability can arise even when the drug itself is legitimate and the prescription may appear ordinary on paper. The issue is not simply whether a medication was dispensed. The issue is whether federal health care dollars were tainted by payments, perks, or side benefits that improperly influenced medical judgment.

    Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate said that the DOJ remains committed to pursuing False Claims Act violations arising from illegal kickbacks, warning that such conduct can undermine patient trust and increase drug costs for taxpayers. The Eastern District of California, HHS-OIG, and the Defense Criminal Investigative Service also participated in the investigation.  

    This settlement also fits into DOJ’s broader enforcement posture. The release specifically ties the case to the Administration’s Task Force to Eliminate Fraud and the National Fraud Enforcement Division, both aimed at fraud, waste, and abuse in federal programs. DOJ emphasized that False Claims Act enforcement remains central to recovering taxpayer dollars and holding wrongdoers accountable.

    The Takeda settlement is another example that shows how federal fraud may not always look like a fake business or a forged invoice. Sometimes it involves more sophisticated schemes like a polished compliance program, a speaker event, a catered dinner, or a repeat “educational” session that quietly changes prescribing incentives.

    Find Corporate Waste exists to help taxpayers, whistleblowers, and concerned insiders spot the patterns others miss.

    If you have information about improper billing, kickbacks, false certifications, pandemic relief abuse, or corporate conduct that may have caused taxpayer money to be wasted, we want to hear from you. Federal fraud often hides behind paperwork that looks clean on the surface. The more people come forward, the harder it becomes for corporations to treat public money like private profit.

  • How States Game the System: Medicaid Fraud and the FMAP Loophole

    Medicaid was originally created as a partnership between the federal government and individual states. The concept was simple: every time a state spends a dollar, the federal government matches a portion of that investment.

    This is known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP).

    Over time, some states discovered a way to manipulate the system by shifting the burden entirely to the federal government while padding their own budgets.

    How Medicaid Fraud Works

    1. The state taxes hospitals or nursing homes.
    2. The state pays this tax back to the provider as Medicaid reimbursements.
    3. The federal government matches a percentage of the returned funds through FMAP.
    4. The provider gets their money + the FMAP.
    5. The state contributes nothing, while the federal government is on the hook.

    Why It All Adds Up to a Big Problem

    This fraud is one of the major factors contributing to the systemic weakness of our entire healthcare system.

    When states are allowed to run these schemes, Medicaid becomes more expensive, draining money away from the people who actually need help.

    Instead of creating a safety net, the system becomes a slush fund for state coffers—and the federal government (read: taxpayers) gets stuck with the tab.

    At Find Corporate Waste, we dig deep into these kinds of backdoor deals because we believe in a system that’s honest, accountable, and actually works for the people it’s supposed to serve. Not one that lets bureaucrats and politically connected hospitals game the rules for a payday.

    But here’s the thing—we can’t do it alone.

    If you’ve seen this kind of scheme from the inside—maybe you work in healthcare, government, or finance—you might be sitting on information that could make a real difference. Thanks to the False Claims Act, whistleblowers who step forward not only help protect public fundsthey may also be eligible for a financial reward if the government recovers money based on their tip.

    ← Back

    Thank you for your response. ✨