Federal prosecutors in Guam secured prison sentences against the operators of a bingo scheme that used charity branding while diverting millions in proceeds for personal gain.
According to the DOJ, Jose Arthur D. Chan Jr., Christine C. Chan, and Michael L. Marasigan were convicted by a jury in May 2025 of conspiracy to operate an illegal gambling business, money laundering conspiracy, and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Christine Chan and Marasigan were also convicted of additional money laundering counts.
The case centered on the Guam Shrine Club and its Hafa Adai Bingo parlor in Tamuning. Prosecutors said the defendants represented that bingo proceeds would support charitable purposes connected to children’s medical travel through the Shriners system. Instead, Hafa Adai Bingo generated approximately $34 million in gross bingo proceeds, while $10,750,804 in net proceeds was diverted and laundered for personal gain.
The sentences were substantial. Art Chan received 60 months in federal prison. Christine Chan received 70 months. Marasigan, described by the DOJ as a fugitive, was sentenced in absentia to 262 months. Each defendant was tied to joint and several restitution of $10,750,804 to the Aloha Shriners, with additional forfeiture judgments imposed.
This was not merely a bookkeeping fraud or a technical gambling violation. The scheme traded on the public’s willingness to support sick children, then converted that trust into private enrichment. That is the kind of fraud President Trump was elected with a broad mandate to confront: schemes where public-facing institutions, charitable language, and insider control are used to separate ordinary people from money meant for a legitimate purpose.
For Find Corporate Waste, the lesson is straightforward: fraud follows trust. Whether the vehicle is a charity, a healthcare program, a federal benefit, or a relief fund, the warning signs often appear where public purpose and private control intersect. This case also matters to FCW’s broader review of nonprofit recipients, because charitable status should never become a shield against scrutiny.
This is our money, and we want it back now.









